Liberal Truth with NO Proof

Whether you bought the shirt, scanned the bar code from the back of a stranger, or you landed here another way, this is right where you need to be. Our goal with Kathy Ann!’s ‘Liberal Truth with NO Proof’ shirt is for people to look into things for themselves instead of just believing what everyone is saying. We’ve taken some of the most common lies about Trump and provided you with an opportunity to learn the truth behind what was really said, or share the truth with others.

This one is pretty easy to disprove. Nobody has ever been able to produce this People magazine article. TO THE GOOGLE 👇
I think the best place to start is with the link to the Epstein flight logs.
These are the files that were publicly released in U.S. v. Maxwell. You can look at the dates,
airport codes, passengers, etc. to corroborate what I’m about to tell you.

And here is a simple breakdown to understanding that Trump couldn’t possibly have been on Little Saint James island. 👇

Prosecutors said in this email straight out of the Epstein files that Trump flew
“on Epstein’s private jet ‘many more’ times than previously had been reported.”
They say there was a total of 8 known times that Trump was on an Epstein private flight.
But in the previous count, depending on whether or not we’re viewing May 15, 1994 as one trip with two legs or two separate trips, we find only 6 or 7 flights on an Epstein private flight.
Where does this “many more” concept from the prosecutors come from? 🙄
The last documented Epstein flight Trump was on was in 1997.
Epstein didn’t purchase Pedo Island until 1998, the year after Trump’s last Epstein flight.
Click here for the justice.gov/Epstein file this email came from.
It’s EFTA00037750 if you have any trouble.
This lie was based on partial statements made by Donald Trump, that when put into context in the full conversation, it was very clear that he was not promoting any kind of racism.
In fact, he has quite the history of the opposite.
👆 This is a compilation of 38 times Donald Trump denounced white supremacy.
He denounced it over and over and over, but they kept asking him to denounce it like he never had.
He even denounced it years before he even thought about running for president.
“The rest” of his Charlottesville statement was cut off – he denounced white supremacy.

Liberals tend to think that the lack of black people in Trump’s cabinet proves that he is racist. But how is that proven? Do we know how many black people have submitted interest in holding a position within the Trump cabinet? I would guess that it’s not nearly as many who would want to be in a Democrat president’s democrat because most black people, at least up until recently, identify politically as Democrat.

Click here to read about this Trump Executive Order regarding Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
I mean, at a certain point, don’t you just have to wonder even a little bit if you’re being lied to?
Click this link for a breakdown from factually.com on things Trump has done for the black community.
🤔 Does he though? Does he hate immigrants? Here he is looking awfully fondly upon his immigrant wife, who by his side, is the most powerful woman in the world right now. Melania did things the right way. She is a LEGAL immigrant who didn’t cut the line or freeload off of American taxpayers. There’s a reason the left leaves out the word “illegal” and changed the wording to “undocumented.” Its meant to confuse people and to make us feel sorry for the people who don’t respect our country enough to go through the proper channels to become citizens.
President Trump’s administration is the ONLY administration generous enough to offer CASH and a free plane ride home to illegal aliens in exchange for self-deportation. If Trump and Vance hate immigrants so much, why are they being so kind instead of just locking them up? Also, if illegal aliens take the stipend, they will be eligible to re-apply the right way for entry into our country. If they have to be forcefully deported, they will never be eligible again. I think that’s perfectly reasonable!
One of the funnier claims made by bleeding heart liberals was that instead of taking deportees home, ICE was dropping them into the ocean. You would think that such a fantastical claim would come with some sort of proof, right? But it didn’t. But we still had to waste our time debunking it. Crazy!

Some people might try to argue that since Trump is deporting all these people, that means he hates immigrants. But the deportations are a natural consequence of what any good leader would do if illegal aliens were depleting resources for our actual citizens. Just last month, I was asked to make a mug for a friend’s mother-in-law to celebrate her becoming a U.S. citizen. Naturalization ceremonies are still happening, we’re just pausing some things until we get our country back on track.

No group or individual has any fewer rights in the United States than another.
Not one.
For over a decade now, liberals have been screaming about what Trump “will” do.
The same amount of rights that we all have right now are the exact same rights
we had before, during, and between Trump’s terms.
Oh, but I do stand corrected on my first sentence:
Women have the “right” to kill their own children inside their womb.
Men don’t have that right.
And doing so is taking away the right to life of all those precious babies before
they get a chance to exit the womb. Women have MORE rights than anybody else.
Liberal women take advantage of these rights by sacrificing their children to Moloch.
There is good news, though: there is forgiveness through Jesus Christ!
Wrong. There was plenty.
Courts didn’t rule that there was no evidence of voter fraud – they refused to hear the cases altogether. Plenty of us saw the fraud with our own eyes.
Just because you didn’t see it, doesn’t mean that the fraud doesn’t exist.
For context, many people think that Trump is a convicted rapist regarding the E. Jean Carroll case. Follow along while I debunk this idea. Then stick around while I challenge Carroll’s claims.
For starters, the E. Jean Carroll case was tried in civil court, where there is no such thing as “conviction” – only *liability.* Convictions are for criminal court. Now let’s see why it would be in civil court. 👇
The criminal statute of limitations expired decades ago, which is why Carroll filed in civil court.
But there was even monkey business going on in civil court. 👇
Carroll’s first civil lawsuit was in 2019 but was only for defamation. She could not include the assault claims because the statute of limitations even for civil court was up. Here’s where the monkey business comes in. Just like the criminal courts did for Trump’s “34 felonies,” the New York civil courts created special circumstances just to “get Trump.” 👇
Here’s the problem I have and what makes me go hmmmm… The Child Victims Act extended future civil statute of limitations to age 55. But the Adult Survivors Act extends it to offenses committed when they were 18 or older. No limit as to for how long they can bring a civil suit against the accused. Why is it only up to age 55 for CVA’s but indefinitely for adults? Why are the most vulnerable (children) getting worse treatment than adults in this case? It all smells a little fishy if you ask me. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if even the CVA was enacted knowing it would be used as a precedent to enact the ASA. Also why would Carroll not have filed charges back then when it supposedly happened? Some say because Trump was so powerful. Right. So wait until he’s literally the most powerful man in the world. That makes sense. 🙄
The standard of proof in most civil cases is only “more likely than not” to be true. This means that even a 1% more leaning to being true will win a case. Are you kidding? No wonder so many people take others to civil court. It really seems to me like they don’t care about justice, they just want money. 🤑
Donald Trump was not “convicted” of “rape.” He wasn’t convicted. He was found civilly liable. And it wasn’t for rape. It was for defamation and assault. Once again, the courts did something that is completely out of the ordinary when the judge claimed that the verdict recognized that Trump “raped” Carroll but “not under the strict legal definition.”

So, Trump is not a convicted rapist. Glad we cleared that up. Now let’s take a closer look at some of the so-called evidence.

The dress Carroll claimed to be wearing during the alleged assault didn’t yet exist at that time.

Here’s a challenge for you: Do some research regarding the rest of what I’m saying 👇 Learn for yourself. That’s the only way you’ll believe it.

DNA found on Carroll’s dress was an unidentified mixture of genetic material from at least four people, including an unknown male. Lab tests found no sperm cells & did not detect ANY chemical indicator of semen. The genetic material was recovered from skin cells & touch DNA (which can be very easily retrieved from an unknowing person). Forensic science cannot determine when DNA was deposited on an item. ANYBODY’S DNA could be very easily obtained & intentionally put on the dress, pretending it’s been there for decades, to frame a person in civil court for millions of dollars. I’d venture to guess that’s why Trump didn’t submit to a DNA test. But why didn’t Carroll pursue it? Why did the judge reject late requests to introduce DNA evidence? U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan noted that lawyers for both Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll ultimately chose not to make DNA testing an active issue as the case moved toward trial. For over three years, Trump’s legal team rejected requests to submit his DNA. Carroll initially sought the sample to compare with unknown male DNA found on the dress she wore during the alleged attack. However, she never legally forced the issue and decided to proceed to trial without it. Shortly before the trial in February 2023, Trump’s team offered to voluntarily submit his DNA, but only on the condition that Carroll provide an undisclosed, missing appendix from her DNA report. Carroll’s lawyers refused the conditional swap, and Judge Kaplan ultimately rejected Trump’s late-stage offer entirely, calling it an untimely delay tactic. Of course he called it that.

Side note: She also claimed  her ex husband strangled her 3 times but that she remains good friends with him. Seems legit. 🤷‍♂️

Click here for short sleeves.
White, black, red, dark chocolate, tan, orange, lime, military green, stone blue, purple, and azalea.
Sizes S, M, L, XL, 2XL, 3XL, 4XL, and 5XL.

Click here for long sleeves.
White, black, red, Irish green, royal, and purple.
Sizes S, M, L, XL, 2XL, and 3XL.

🌟Don’t forget to enter discount code Kathy Ann! at checkout for 20% off!🌟

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Armentrout Shout-Out

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading